Dodgey, I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.
I still think playing that way will get you in a lot of truble, but I respect your opinion. No idea for me to force feed my opinion to you, lol.
I just have to comment this part:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodgey  ...3rd is are not worth the time spent in SnGs. You spend an hour or more to break even or make $5 or so. You'd be better off at a cash table to be honest. For me, 3rd in a SnG is a consolation prize for a wasted hour plus... |
That is why people multitable, playing from 2 upto 24 (!) Sitt & Go's at the same time. That is also why finishing ITM is so much more important in S&G's than in MTT's. It doesn't make a big difference if you win or barely make it ITM when you're multitabling Sitt & Go's - As long as you make a profit.
As a sidenote I could also ad that it's not possible to multitable if you only have 5 times the buy-in, which is also one of the main reasons why I think you'll need a LOT more buy-ins.
There are also quite many pro's who make their living only playing Sitt & Go's. There's no way they could do that if they weren't playing many S&G's simultaneously (multitabling). If they only played one S&G at a time and won it every single time, they would still make a lot less profit than if they played ten S&G's at a time and barely made it ITM in all of them. I know this is a drastic example, but just to prove my point.